<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for History of Animation in Court</title>
	<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac</link>
	<description>History of Animation in Court is a video podcast series that features some of the most interesting and innovative applications of computer animation for use in the courtroom. Z-Axis Corporation pioneered in the creation of animated trial exhibits in the late 1980s and has continued to develop new ways to present visual information to judges and juries. This collection will include some of the landmark cases to use computer animation over the years as well as other less famous, but still innovative and interesting applications of computer graphics. The animations illustrate a wide range of subjects including airplane crashes, mechanical devices, explosions, drug and chemical reactions and terrorist attacks.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on World Trade Center by Benny</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-641</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-641</guid>
					<description>Just like how NIST was only charged with explaining the initiation of the collapse, this animation seem to only deal with the plane impact and initial failure of the structure around the impact site. Do you have any top-to-bottom simulations? I would love to see you try and get WTC1 or 2 to fall in 10-12 seconds.

Another interesting simulation would be one for the alleged kerosene fireball that zig-zagged down the staggered elevator shafts, all the way down to the lobby, and then blew out the ceiling and windows. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like how NIST was only charged with explaining the initiation of the collapse, this animation seem to only deal with the plane impact and initial failure of the structure around the impact site. Do you have any top-to-bottom simulations? I would love to see you try and get WTC1 or 2 to fall in 10-12 seconds.</p>
<p>Another interesting simulation would be one for the alleged kerosene fireball that zig-zagged down the staggered elevator shafts, all the way down to the lobby, and then blew out the ceiling and windows. Just a thought.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World Trade Center by balthazar</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-623</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-623</guid>
					<description>The more I watch these videos the more I believe that 9/11 was an inside job. When you see a building start to topple over until it reaches a 70% angle you better expect it to keep toppling in that direction where all the weight is distributed, as the Law of Inertia dictates. 

Weight is distributed in the direction of least resistance. If the upper portion of the building fell upon the lower... in order for it to distribute its weight straight down all the way through.. that would mean that it fell flat upon its foundation all the way through... which is just about impossible to do. The building would most likely meet unequal resistance from the surface it fell on... meaning one side of the building would fall faster then the other. The building would therefore fall at an angle as displayed in the video... If you'll notice the top portion of the building does fall angularly... at the very beginning.

If demolition is considered, the reason why the building tilts at the beginning as though ready to topple over and then miraculously falls straight downward can be easily answered. The building met unequal resistance. Most likely the section most damaged collapsed first pulling the rest of the building with it and toppling over, until, of course, demolition blows up everything beneath it, eliminating resistance, and allowing it to fall straight downwards, thus, discontinuing its toppling motion. 

The top section of the south tower began to tilt at approx 9:59 am. At this moment, a large cloud of grey dust suddenly puffed out of the building. The 35 stories of the top section continued to tip to 23 degrees past vertical. At this point, the upper segment was hanging over the edge by approx 65 feet. In frame by fame pictures, one can see the concentric and uniform mushrooming grey cloud rapidly expand to envelp the building. As this is happening, one can see debris being blown away from the building with an extremely powerful blast. The overhanging upper section was then mysteriously shrouded and never seen again. Then the whole building came straight down. With an incredibly fast 10.4 seconds the once might tower was reduced to a pile of totally pulverized remains. Government story is that this building experienced a compression or a pancake demoltion caused by weakened trusses and weight from above. At first this explanation sounds plausible, especially because this is what the television reports have told us time and time again. But common sense would indicate that the center of gravity of the top section was not centered over the lower section. Thus, if there was a compression demolition, it would not be uniform because the center of gravity was considerably off center. Secondly, the severed top section that was tilting very much over the edge would fall somewhat independently. Third, this section would fall at a fast rate than the anchored lower section because it would not meet the resistance of the intact lower section. Fourth, the top and lower sections would break into pieces, they would not pulverize. None of these four things happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I watch these videos the more I believe that 9/11 was an inside job. When you see a building start to topple over until it reaches a 70% angle you better expect it to keep toppling in that direction where all the weight is distributed, as the Law of Inertia dictates. </p>
<p>Weight is distributed in the direction of least resistance. If the upper portion of the building fell upon the lower&#8230; in order for it to distribute its weight straight down all the way through.. that would mean that it fell flat upon its foundation all the way through&#8230; which is just about impossible to do. The building would most likely meet unequal resistance from the surface it fell on&#8230; meaning one side of the building would fall faster then the other. The building would therefore fall at an angle as displayed in the video&#8230; If you&#8217;ll notice the top portion of the building does fall angularly&#8230; at the very beginning.</p>
<p>If demolition is considered, the reason why the building tilts at the beginning as though ready to topple over and then miraculously falls straight downward can be easily answered. The building met unequal resistance. Most likely the section most damaged collapsed first pulling the rest of the building with it and toppling over, until, of course, demolition blows up everything beneath it, eliminating resistance, and allowing it to fall straight downwards, thus, discontinuing its toppling motion. </p>
<p>The top section of the south tower began to tilt at approx 9:59 am. At this moment, a large cloud of grey dust suddenly puffed out of the building. The 35 stories of the top section continued to tip to 23 degrees past vertical. At this point, the upper segment was hanging over the edge by approx 65 feet. In frame by fame pictures, one can see the concentric and uniform mushrooming grey cloud rapidly expand to envelp the building. As this is happening, one can see debris being blown away from the building with an extremely powerful blast. The overhanging upper section was then mysteriously shrouded and never seen again. Then the whole building came straight down. With an incredibly fast 10.4 seconds the once might tower was reduced to a pile of totally pulverized remains. Government story is that this building experienced a compression or a pancake demoltion caused by weakened trusses and weight from above. At first this explanation sounds plausible, especially because this is what the television reports have told us time and time again. But common sense would indicate that the center of gravity of the top section was not centered over the lower section. Thus, if there was a compression demolition, it would not be uniform because the center of gravity was considerably off center. Secondly, the severed top section that was tilting very much over the edge would fall somewhat independently. Third, this section would fall at a fast rate than the anchored lower section because it would not meet the resistance of the intact lower section. Fourth, the top and lower sections would break into pieces, they would not pulverize. None of these four things happened.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World Trade Center by paul</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-287</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 09:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-287</guid>
					<description>This is great, it explains so much would be good to see more and some indepth stuff on what realy happend that day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great, it explains so much would be good to see more and some indepth stuff on what realy happend that day.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delta 191  (Connors v. The United States) by Gary Freed</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-248</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-248</guid>
					<description>As mentioned in our introduction to the podcasts, most of the courtroom animations are without audio or narration making them of limited use in their raw form. Until the advent of this podcast series there was almost no demand to see all the Delta animations. Only the scenes with the cockpit voice recordings have received some interest.  And, we have made no particular effort to advertise their availability. However, the entire group of animations is available from our corporate offices.  We only charge a nominal fee sufficient to cover the required labor, supplies and shipping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned in our introduction to the podcasts, most of the courtroom animations are without audio or narration making them of limited use in their raw form. Until the advent of this podcast series there was almost no demand to see all the Delta animations. Only the scenes with the cockpit voice recordings have received some interest.  And, we have made no particular effort to advertise their availability. However, the entire group of animations is available from our corporate offices.  We only charge a nominal fee sufficient to cover the required labor, supplies and shipping.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delta 191  (Connors v. The United States) by Doug</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-231</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-231</guid>
					<description>The creation of the Delta 191 animations was commissioned by the US government and the project was paid for by taxpayer dollars. When will Z-Axis release these animations in there entirety and why have they not already done so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The creation of the Delta 191 animations was commissioned by the US government and the project was paid for by taxpayer dollars. When will Z-Axis release these animations in there entirety and why have they not already done so?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World Trade Center by Gary Freed</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-91</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-91</guid>
					<description>Kevin, I apologize for taking so long to respond to your comment but the holidays, blizzards in Denver, and some pressing projects kept me away.  Thanks to Rudy for stepping in.  Anyway, I understand your concern and am in the process of updating the podcast description so that someone linking to just this one podcast will have a better understanding of what to expect.  

On the other hand, there is a reason why we did not include the entire package of raw animations used in court.    The total run time of all these animations is probably over an hour and entirely without sound.   These animations were designed to accompany the testimony of the expert witness while he gave oral descriptions live in the courtroom.   Watching them without this testimony is like watching paint dry.  They are really not stand-alone pieces. That is why the podcast series has shown only excerpts of the animations along with our narration regarding a little of the history of the case and the background of the production process.

In one regard presenting these works is a commercial for me and for Z-Axis. However, the intent was to share with the world what we think is a unique and significant application of computer animation that might otherwise go unnoticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, I apologize for taking so long to respond to your comment but the holidays, blizzards in Denver, and some pressing projects kept me away.  Thanks to Rudy for stepping in.  Anyway, I understand your concern and am in the process of updating the podcast description so that someone linking to just this one podcast will have a better understanding of what to expect.  </p>
<p>On the other hand, there is a reason why we did not include the entire package of raw animations used in court.    The total run time of all these animations is probably over an hour and entirely without sound.   These animations were designed to accompany the testimony of the expert witness while he gave oral descriptions live in the courtroom.   Watching them without this testimony is like watching paint dry.  They are really not stand-alone pieces. That is why the podcast series has shown only excerpts of the animations along with our narration regarding a little of the history of the case and the background of the production process.</p>
<p>In one regard presenting these works is a commercial for me and for Z-Axis. However, the intent was to share with the world what we think is a unique and significant application of computer animation that might otherwise go unnoticed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delta 191  (Connors v. The United States) by Gary Freed</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-90</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-90</guid>
					<description>Kevin, I apologize for taking so long to respond to your comment but the holidays, blizzards in Denver, and some pressing projects kept me away.  Thanks to Rudy for stepping in.  Anyway, I understand your concern and am in the process of updating the podcast descriptions so that someone linking to just one podcast will have a better understanding of what to expect.  

On the other hand, there is a reason why we did not include the entire package of raw animations used in court.    These pieces total about an hour in length and with the exception of a few with audio from the cockpit voice recorder are entirely without sound.   These animations were designed to illustrate the testimony of the expert witnesses while they gave oral descriptions live in the courtroom.   Watching them without this testimony is like watching paint dry.  They are really not stand-alone pieces. That is why the podcast series has shown only excerpts of the animations along with our narration regarding a little of the history of the case and the background of the production process.

In addition, a number of these animations were my personal work.  I was the animator on Delta, forensic investigator and animator on Pepcon, and the senior producer on the WTC case.    And as a point of historical significance, the Delta animation was the first use of a computer animated reconstruction in a major case in the US.  So in one regard presenting these works is a commercial for me and for Z-Axis.  The intent, however, was to share with the world what we think is a unique and significant application of computer animation that might otherwise go unnoticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, I apologize for taking so long to respond to your comment but the holidays, blizzards in Denver, and some pressing projects kept me away.  Thanks to Rudy for stepping in.  Anyway, I understand your concern and am in the process of updating the podcast descriptions so that someone linking to just one podcast will have a better understanding of what to expect.  </p>
<p>On the other hand, there is a reason why we did not include the entire package of raw animations used in court.    These pieces total about an hour in length and with the exception of a few with audio from the cockpit voice recorder are entirely without sound.   These animations were designed to illustrate the testimony of the expert witnesses while they gave oral descriptions live in the courtroom.   Watching them without this testimony is like watching paint dry.  They are really not stand-alone pieces. That is why the podcast series has shown only excerpts of the animations along with our narration regarding a little of the history of the case and the background of the production process.</p>
<p>In addition, a number of these animations were my personal work.  I was the animator on Delta, forensic investigator and animator on Pepcon, and the senior producer on the WTC case.    And as a point of historical significance, the Delta animation was the first use of a computer animated reconstruction in a major case in the US.  So in one regard presenting these works is a commercial for me and for Z-Axis.  The intent, however, was to share with the world what we think is a unique and significant application of computer animation that might otherwise go unnoticed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delta 191  (Connors v. The United States) by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-89</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-89</guid>
					<description>Thanks, Rudy.  Just so I'm clear, your intro tag above refers to &quot;this animation&quot; and &quot;these animations&quot; but the video here is not those.  Where is &quot;this computer animated reconstruction of the crash of Delta flight 191 for the United States Department of Justice in the case of Connors v. The United States&quot;?  That's all I'm saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Rudy.  Just so I&#8217;m clear, your intro tag above refers to &#8220;this animation&#8221; and &#8220;these animations&#8221; but the video here is not those.  Where is &#8220;this computer animated reconstruction of the crash of Delta flight 191 for the United States Department of Justice in the case of Connors v. The United States&#8221;?  That&#8217;s all I&#8217;m saying.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delta 191  (Connors v. The United States) by rudy.ramsey</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-88</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 04:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-88</guid>
					<description>The folks best suited to reply to Kevin's comment are on holiday just now, but they'll respond in a few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks best suited to reply to Kevin&#8217;s comment are on holiday just now, but they&#8217;ll respond in a few days.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World Trade Center by rudy.ramsey</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-87</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 04:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-87</guid>
					<description>The folks best suited to reply to Kevin\'s comment are on holiday just now, but they\'ll respond in a few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks best suited to reply to Kevin\&#8217;s comment are on holiday just now, but they\&#8217;ll respond in a few days.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World Trade Center by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-86</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/world-trade-center/#comment-86</guid>
					<description>Is this website just a shameless commercial for your company, or are you putting out evidentiary material for the public to examine?  Decide.  You need to properly label it, especially if you go around place external links back to this site from Wikipedia and other non-commercial sites where people are looking for research material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this website just a shameless commercial for your company, or are you putting out evidentiary material for the public to examine?  Decide.  You need to properly label it, especially if you go around place external links back to this site from Wikipedia and other non-commercial sites where people are looking for research material.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delta 191  (Connors v. The United States) by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-85</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/delta-191/#comment-85</guid>
					<description>This is NOT the animation used in court -- it is a commercial for the person who created it.  Please re-label this posting to more accurately reflect what it is.  Wikipedia should also alter its referral to this link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is NOT the animation used in court &#8212; it is a commercial for the person who created it.  Please re-label this posting to more accurately reflect what it is.  Wikipedia should also alter its referral to this link.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CU Law School Presentation:  Gary Freed - WTC Trial Graphics by lisa sanford</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/cu-law-school-presentation-gary-freed-wtc-trial-graphics/#comment-83</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/cu-law-school-presentation-gary-freed-wtc-trial-graphics/#comment-83</guid>
					<description>awsome, awesome, awesome.  Gary, you're a natural presenter, you would make a great teacher/public speaker. I learned so much watching this. This is an excellent way to disseminate information to each other as well as to the public.  impressive.  lisa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awsome, awesome, awesome.  Gary, you&#8217;re a natural presenter, you would make a great teacher/public speaker. I learned so much watching this. This is an excellent way to disseminate information to each other as well as to the public.  impressive.  lisa.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Royal Palm Hotel Collapse by Steve Cohen</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/royal-palm-hotel-collapse/#comment-82</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 06:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/royal-palm-hotel-collapse/#comment-82</guid>
					<description>Great job Cindy and Gary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job Cindy and Gary
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Royal Palm Hotel Collapse by Blawg Blog</title>
		<link>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/royal-palm-hotel-collapse/#comment-27</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://podcasts.zaxis.com/pac/royal-palm-hotel-collapse/#comment-27</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mediation and History of Animation in Court...&lt;/strong&gt;

Mediation and History of Animation in Court...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mediation and History of Animation in Court&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Mediation and History of Animation in Court&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
